A Lost Agenda

By Dick Field, March 28, 2012

Years ago it always drove me crazy when the opposition Liberals, Progressive Conservatives and NDP cooperated to smear the Reform Party as having a “hidden agenda.” That agenda was neither hidden nor an evil manifestation of so-called Western red-necked Neanderthal racism.

It was printed in plain old English and open to all to see. Obviously, the opposition rhetoric was extreme and designed to scare off the average voter who may have been interested in this new Party. The socialist left wing copy-cat media, especially the CBC, Canada’s Liberal mouthpiece, lapped it up and practically frothed at the mouth.

Today, after the multiple transitions of the Reform Party and its amalgamation with the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada into today’s Conservative Party of Canada (CPC), we have finally reached the goal of being the majority responsible governing party. Our Party leaders and the Right Honourable Prime Minister of Canada, Stephen Harper are to be admired for the steady hand they have displayed throughout the years of minority government and during our present economic trials. However, we need look back to some of our original Reform goals.

It is good to look back in order to jog our memories and review our original Agenda. On occasion, we found mistakes and changed our views because we saw our original plans were wrong and not conducive to the better Canada we sought. Our Party does learn, in contrast to the Trudeau Liberal idea of their own eternal perfection. Unfortunately, the CPC seems to have accepted some of the major Liberal Legacy policies and refuses to get rid of them.

Nevertheless, it is rather humorous when we hear the Liberals and Socialists bleat, “the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) plans to wreck everything we have built over so many years.” The “everything they built” and cry about losing are the very Legacy Liberal policies our guys seem reluctant to trash. If this weird switch-about continues, our Party may collapse and if we do, Canada will continue its Liberal-socialist descent into a third world hodge-podge of warring poverty-ridden multicultural tribes and religions.

The “Red Tory Mindset:
During my volunteer canvassing work during the last Provincial and Federal elections, I was very disturbed to find that the majority of the people running the show self-identified as Red Tories (fiscally conservative but socially liberal). I honestly liked every one of them but if I talked about the dangers of separate identity Multiculturalism or the divisive effects of forced Official Bilingualism, it was like talking to the aliens of some far away planet. You know the look; the eyes open a little wider, a blank stare and a weak smile. Like, “what’s this guy talking about?”

This may explain why we see the suppression of our Reform agenda by the leadership of the CPC. I do admit that it takes time to bring people to see the truths of democracy; the necessity of understanding the rule of law; the equality of each of us before and under that law and its millennium of historical derivation. These underpinnings of freedom and justice are rarely thought of in the rough and tumble of daily politics. Yet, the only path enabling our society to pursue their peaceful goals is founded upon them.

Politics today is all about winning votes, winning seats in parliament and forming the government. The amalgamated CPC has done that; so let’s look back to our Reform policies and principles to understand where we now need to go in order to strengthen our Party and grow, not decline and lose our supporters.

The Blue Book 1995 – a Way forward lost and found:
Strange, but did you notice that this sub-title seems (unintentionally) to resonate with ex-slave ship captain, John Newton’s prayer: “Amazing Grace! How sweet the sound, that sav’d a wretch like me! I was once lost but now am found. Was blind, but now I see.”

Reform Principles and Policies:
The 1993-5 Reform Blue book is extensive, so I have chosen to list only those Reform policies and Principles we would pray the “blind” CPC and P.M. Harper might “now see” are so necessary to implement. They were correct then and are now because their implementation is necessary to restore the balance of fairness and justice in Canada.

Multiculturalism: Our Reform Party stood for, “the acceptance and integration of immigrants to Canada into the mainstream of Canadian life regardless of race, language or culture. We oppose the current concept of hyphenated Canadianism and we would end funding of the multicultural program and abolish the Department of Multiculturalism.
We supported the right of individuals and groups to preserve their cultural heritage using their own resources.”

Today, it is even more dangerous to leave this Liberal Legacy policy in place because the Multicultural Act of Canada has opened the door to a totally alien culture imbued in a theocratic intolerant religion that if encouraged to grow and spread, will destroy us. Most of our citizens still think the Islamic religion is “just another religion,” It is not.* This Act must be repealed, and quickly. We have learned that all cultures are not equal.

* Note: Please use Google and search for Islam Religion of Peace Terrorism. Sub title; “One body at a time.” Spend an hour on the site and click on “about Islam” for all you need to know about Islam. The site also details 18,665 Jihadist killings since 9/11.

Official Languages: Our Reform Party opposed the concept of Canada as a meeting of two founding races, cultures and languages. It stated that it was an inappropriate description of the reality in regions outside central Canada and unfair to the majority of unilingual Canadians. It also made plain that we supported freedom of speech and rejected comprehensive language legislation whether in the form of forced bilingualism or unilingualism, regardless of the level of government.

Our Reform Party supported the recognition of French in Quebec and English elsewhere as the predominate language of work and society but supported personal language bilingualism and minority language education rights,

Our Reform Party supported official bilingualism in key institutions, such as Parliament and the Supreme Court. (The latter policy now changed by the CPC because of public outcry). Here we see an example that the CPC can grow and learn, – very encouraging.

Our Reform Party also stated they believed that bilingualism for critical federal services should be available where the need is sufficient to warrant the provision of minority services on a cost-effective basis.

Most importantly, from the Blue Book, “The Reform Party supports the repeal of the Official Languages Act.”

Human Rights Kangaroo Courts and Trudeau’s Charter: Our Reform Blue Book of 1993-5 made no mention of our outlandish tribunal system or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It seems it was not understood at the time that these constructs trashed every principle and rule of law existent in Canada. These totally foreign monstrosities were designed almost exclusively for the benefit of supposedly “disadvantaged minorities.”

In our 1996 Fresh Start brochure for Canadians however, our Reform Party made it clear they recognized their error by stating, “Over the past two decades, Liberal and Conservative governments have tried to achieve equality by passing legislation that treats different groups of Canadians differently under the law, based on race, gender and other characteristics. Reform believes that this special status approach is divisive and leads to intolerance and inequality. It went on to say:

“Reform affirms the equality of every individual citizen under the law and the right of every citizen to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law.” (Thank goodness we finally recognized this ancient right of all English common law citizens upon which Canada was founded. It is not something Reform dreamed up. Again, Reform learned from the electorate who remembered the truth; something the Liberals never do).

Our Reform policy then declared, “A Reform government will ensure that all Human Rights legislation, including the Charter of Rights and Freedoms reflect these principles, which refer to equality of opportunity rather than equality of outcome. Equality of outcome requires that the rights and freedoms of some Canadians are violated in order to benefit other Canadians; equality of opportunity means respecting the rights of all Canadians.” Therefore:

A Reform government will:
* Discontinue Federal affirmative action and employment equity programs.

* Support the repeal of Section 15 Subsection (2) of the Charter that permits the government to engage in affirmative action legislation and other forms of “reverse discrimination.”

Property Rights: The Blue Book makes it plain that the Reform Party supports amending the Charter to recognize that “in Canada there has existed and shall continue to exist the right of every person to the ownership, use and enjoyment of property both real and personal, and the right not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law.”

“Furthermore, it should be recognized that in Canada no person should be deprived directly or indirectly by any law of Parliament or a provincial Legislature, of the ownership, use and enjoyment of property, unless the law provides for just and timely compensation.”

My Summary: These listed Liberal Legacy affronts to all Canadians were a product of their blind adoption of Trudeau’s top-down form of French-type government mandated law. These evils were addressed by Reform early in their Agenda. As we have seen they learned; but now the CPC is in a position to act and act they must.

Much has been done, but these most damaging Liberal Legacy policies, are still allowed to exist and apparently even strongly supported by the CPC. As a result, many of our members and supporters are extremely disturbed. We are insulted daily by our own Party’s seeming indifference to our concerns.

Not implementing these key Reform policies is also damaging because our leadership’s poor example is causing most Provincial governments to continue these defunct Liberal Legacy programs as if they were somehow legitimate. This is a disgrace. Too many of our members and supporters are grinding their teeth in dismay.

On March 27, 2012, this week, while sitting in the East Gallery of our Ontario Legislature, I witnessed yet once again, this government’s indifference to the plight of our Ontario landowners (mostly farmers) whose legitimate property rights have been criminally overridden by a provincially controlled charitable organization’s private police force.
This trashing of ancient property rights and the fundemental rule of law could not have happened if the Reform Party’s 1995 policy had been implemented.

Canada must be brought back on course to implement our founding father’s dream of a grand and golden future for all Canadians. We must remain true to our Conservative Principles. If Quebec does not wish to participate with us, then we must separate it from our English-speaking future and encourage them to validate their Nation status by going it alone. We can then become much more productive and happier neighbours.

In the meantime, I would strongly advise Right Honourable Prime Minister Harper and the CPC to act quickly to repeal these Liberal Legacy policies and implement our own while there is still the window of opportunity to get the job done.

*******************************************************************************

Dick Field is the former founder and Chairman of the Voice of Canadian Committees and the Montgomery Tavern Society. He was editor and publisher of Voices, their newspaper. He is a graduate of the University of Toronto and Queen’s University. Dick has a wide variety of life experiences and has traveled worldwide both as a businessman and the co-owner of a travel business. He retired as a marketing officer after a thirty year career with a major Toronto life insurance company. Dick is proud to have served in combat during WW2 with the Royal Canadian Artillery in northwest Europe. Dick can be reached at letters@canadafreepress.com

The Liberal Party of Canada is struggling to identify itself. They know the Conservative Party of Canada is not what Canadians really want. After all only 39.6% of Canada’s voters voted for them. They seriously contemplate resurrecting their former coalition with the National Democratic Party (NDP). They even reach in desperation for Bob Rae that tired old NDP loser as their messiah of resurrection.

They talk about getting back to “where the people really are;” their natural Center in the Right–Left spectrum of Canadian politics where they long ruled. The truth is they never were in the center of Canadian politics, at least not since McKenzie King lead the Party longer than any other Prime Minister of Canada. The only Center this mob ever occupied was a deadly third dimensional (3D) quicksand trap that traitorous P.E. Trudeau and his cronies led them into in his desire to divide and conquer English-speaking Canada.

How these Liberal artifacts, the inheritors and residue of Trudeau’s “Architects of Canada’s Devolution,” can even dare to think they can pull themselves out when they are up to their necks and going down, merely demonstrates their arrogance. They have learned nothing. They have totally squandered the publics trust. What an incredibly difficult chore Mr. Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) are now undertaking to rectify the damage to Canada that these radicals have left behind.

The Liberal Extremist Steps to the Devolution of Canada
Trudeau’s Liberals, with Pearson’s earlier encouragement divided us by language and culture, English and French – the Quebecois and the Rest of Canada. They even had the temerity to persuade parliament to declare Quebec a Nation.

“The Liberal Party of Canada supports without any conditions the recognition of Quebec as a Nation.” Denis Coderre, Liberal Member of Parliament.

The Liberals rode roughshod over Western Canada and dictatorially destroyed Alberta’s oil industry when they passed the infamous National Energy Policy of 1980, thus alienating Alberta and the other resource based provinces of western Canada.

The Trudeau Liberals allowed the FLQ of Quebec to violently break every law of the land before refusing to step in until the very last moment, when he did so in order to prevent then from interfering with his plans for the surreptitious takeover of Canada by Quebec. They also failed Canada again by allowing Quebec to honour these murdering revolutionaries as “Patriots” after their return from exile in Cuba.

The Liberals deliberately failed to protect all Canadian citizens from Quebec’s illegal language laws and crass language police, causing half a million plus English speakers to sell out and flee Quebec. This injustice and flagrant insult to the fathers of the Confederation of 1867 is never mentioned by any Liberal 3D “Centrist” radical.

The Liberals passed new wide open door Immigration and Refugee Protection Acts beginning in the 1960’s that permitted every person under the sun (culturally adaptable or not) into our country and gave Quebec the right to control its own immigrant intake.

They well knew that Quebec’s culture would change without Quebec controlling its provincial intake. It was again an accommodation designed to allow their elitist partners in Montreal to prevent known violent radicals from upsetting their hidden agenda – the “French” rule of all Canada;

“Given these facts, should French-speaking people concentrate their
efforts on Quebec or take the whole of Canada as their base? In my
opinion, they should do both; and for the purpose they could find no
better instrument than federalism”, Pierre Trudeau, Page 31 “Federalism”
(1968).

Four out of five Immigration offices in Great Britain our historic source of immigrants, mostly to the Rest of Canada, were closed. Offices across the third world and in French speaking countries were opened. Only 12% of immigrants settle in Quebec; 60% pile into Ontario alone. Adding to this mess was the total laxity of immigration and refugee authorities. Abuses were ignored and even encouraged by the Liberals, especially in Ontario and British Columbia, the latter taking about 25%.

Hundreds of thousands poured in with no identification, visas, passports or other papers (flushed down airline toilets) or falsely declaring themselves refugees. The rest of the world approves 15% of Refugee applicants; we took 40 to 55%. The Liberals allowed the declined refugees to appeal forever and finally lost track of them. Few were ejected.

Blind to the dangerous path Trudeau was taking them, they passed the Multicultural Act of Canada, declaring all cultures in Canada the equal of each other. Nice eh! So the latest backward third-world illiterate coming from some brutal dictatorship arrived in Canada and instantly became the cultural equal of a free, well educated citizen of Canada. A citizen with a deep 1000-year heritage of a hard won culture of free speech, freedom of the press and a vibrant democracy of the rule of law.

Through the new mechanism of Human Rights Kangaroo court tribunals (they also established) they took to punishing journalists, police, teachers or any other luckless outspoken Canadian that had transgressed some ethnic taboo or was said to have commented negatively on the behaviour of any identifiable minority. They insultingly ordered these victims to take sensitivity training classes (run by “expert” minorities). The new designated minorities were never required to take such courses regarding insults to Canadian sensibilities.

Politically Correct Behavior thus became another disgusting Liberal legacy. Many non-minority Canadians became frightened to say anything, for fear of offending or running afoul of some rule or regulation and causing themselves or their employer grief. Today, the term “politically correct” is everywhere and heaven forbid one should ever be called a racist. Some are so terrified that for them their society seems like walking on glass.

The Liberals pushed the glories of a Mosaic of Cultures. The delights of colourful dresses (don’t dare call them costumes) new foods, music and dance were the “in” thing. True, we enjoy such experiences. However, we are consigned to the dustbin of cultural history when our culture is equated with a tiny piece of coloured tile.

The Liberals then told their new voters that Canada was a “Blank Slate,” we had no existing culture (other than Quebecois) and it was up to these new immigrants to help write a new Canadian culture for we amorphous nobodies.

That is how the Liberal third dimension (think depth) quicksand “Center” of Canadian radical politics destroyed our British derived culture and devolved that culture into a pale image of its former self. All this while busily devolving and extolling the introverted failing “French” culture of the Nation of Quebec.

Radical Extremist Liberals Rule not Govern
Notice the Liberals (and unfortunately the so-called Red Tories under Clark and Mulroney) never use the word “govern.” They use the words “power” or “rule.” They don’t see themselves governing responsibly. So they then proceeded to “rule” again by backing Trudeau’s badly flawed Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982).

That Charter is the deepest part of the quicksand trap into which Trudeau led his Liberal followers. The Charter so abuses our great existing English common laws and principles that the deceived novice and legally untrained person sees it as, “a wonderful document guaranteeing my freedoms.” It is in fact a total reversal of the rule of law that has been forced upon unsuspecting Canadians. Are my statements correct? Here are some facts;

First, no government has the right to dictate to you what your freedoms are. Their job is to defend our freedoms. Second, they inserted group rights into the Charter (special laws for special groups of people), an anathema to our British derived principle that, “Every individual person is the equal of every other individual person before and under the Law.” Third, they gave carte blanche to nine unelected judges of the Supreme Court of Canada (and every other senior judge in Canada) to use the Charter to dictate new law to Canadians, thus by-passing Parliament. There is much more effrontery to Canadian freedoms in the Charter menace, the above is but a small sample.

Trudeau’s Hidden Agenda
Yes, Trudeau had an Agenda, but not at all hidden from his Liberal English-speaking Canadian enablers. So why did they follow him into this deadly path of quicksand? The answer is they felt privileged to sit around the cabinet table with charismatic Trudeau, that international star of false intellectual superiority, and bathe in his public spotlight.

These dullards convinced themselves that, “We, the Liberals know better than the public, so we will do what’s right, regardless of their opinion” (Sergio Marchi, a former Minister of Immigration) and a classic example of the Liberal mindset of power and rule versus responsible government. Some however, were duped into believing it was all about keeping Quebec in Canada when precisely the opposite was underway. It was as we have seen, all about Quebec ruling Canada.

They were also bought and paid for. They voted themselves huge salary and pension benefits and other emoluments. Not the least of which was the certainty of future appointments to the Senate, foreign economic and cultural ambassadorships, corporate boards, university presidents etc. Rewards aplenty!

No wonder the current crop is now dreaming of regaining power. It doesn’t bother them that the takeover of Canada by Quebec and their French language regime is in the cards. Again, here is verification that the sinking Liberals know the Agenda;

“My roll as Secretary of State of Canada is first and foremost to ensure that my French compatriots in Canada feel with deep conviction, as I do, that this is their country and that it reflects their image”. “I too had some difficult years as a politician; I’m still having them, in fact, because everything we undertake and everything we are doing to make Canada a French state is part of a venture I have shared for many years with a number of people”. “You know the idea, the challenge, the ambition of making Canada a French country both inside and outside Quebec — an idea some people consider a bit crazy is something a little beyond the ordinary imagination” – Serge Joyal, Secretary of State (quote from J.V. Andrews book “Enough).”

The Official Languages Act (forced bilingualism) This is perhaps the cruelest Liberal construct of all. Passed by Liberals and Red Tories and now bought into by all Parties excludes 95% of all English speaking Canadians from ever being employed by their own governments. It is an ongoing cause for civil unrest. It must be destroyed. Such inequity cannot be justified. All Parties need to return to the original 1867 Act of Confederation.

The sinking misled good old Liberal Anglo Boys should have rebelled but no, they walked blindly behind Trudeau, Chrétien and all the others that followed, almost disappearing beneath the quicksand and dooming the Liberal Party forever. Their current chances of getting out of that 3D Centrist deep and deadly trap are nil to Zero, especially if Rae becomes their tainted forlorn hope.

A Final Comment: Test a Liberal, see if he has learned anything. Ask him, “If you take over government, will you get rid of these abominable Human Rights Kangaroo Courts that trash every law and principle of our once proud and free society?” My guess is that he will glibly respond, “I see your point, help us out and I’ll guarantee when we are back in power we’ll look into it.” Yeah Sure!

**************************************************************************************************

Dick Field is the former founder and Chairman of the Voice of Canadian Committees and the Montgomery Tavern Society. He was editor and publisher of Voices, their newspaper. He is a graduate of the University of Toronto and Queen’s University. Dick has a wide variety of life experiences and has traveled worldwide both as a businessman and the co-owner of a travel business. He retired as a marketing officer after a thirty year career with a major Toronto life insurance company. Dick is proud to have served in combat during WW2 with the Royal Canadian Artillery in northwest Europe. Dick can be reached at rfield000@sympatico.ca

Last week on Thursday, February 2, 2012, I sat nearly six hours straining to hear (bad acoustics) an appeal to the Ontario Appeal Court concerning the legal right of a small town in Eastern Ontario named Russell, to issue and enforce a bilingual sign bylaw requiring private individuals and corporations to display any of their business signage in French and English.

The Appellants were Howard Galganov and Serge Brisson. In Mr. Galganov’s case he had his signage solely in English and Mr. Brisson’s was solely in French. Mr. Galganov’s signage appealed to the town’s 90% English-speakers and Mr. Brisson’s to its 90% French-speakers. Each of the Appellants objected to being fined for refusing to accede to the bilingual bylaw. The Town of Russell is about 1700 people in size and approximately 50% are English-speakers and the other 50% are French- speakers.

As expected, the lawyers acting for the Appellants quoted many precedents for the Town of Russell not having the right to issue bylaws concerning language use and the Township’s pro bilingual-sign lawyers quoted signage law precedents having little to do with language. The latter’s main argument seemed to be that the French language was under threat of being lost because the proportion of French speakers to English speakers was declining (although their French population was growing – but not fast enough) and the signage was needed to make the French speaking citizens feel comfortable in a growing English milieu.

This reporter’s frustration
All through the hearing, I grew increasingly angry. I was frustrated and incensed that the right of any of us, before and under the law, to speak any damn language we like or print in any language we want, or mail or e-mail in any language under the sun was being tampered with again, as it has been since 1965. I kept seeing that pirouetting Trudeau sneering behind the Queen as she signed the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 and seemingly axed Canada’s British derived laws of freedom.

I sincerely hope Galganov and Brisson win but they should never have had to bring their case before any court. Already a Francophone lower court judge ruled against them and levied excessive costs payable to the Town of Russell in a very suspect prejudicial effort to shut down the Appellant’s cry for justice.

Going through my mind again and again was the fact that I, as a World War II combat veteran, 87 years of age, have to sit and bear witness to work of thousands of thankless unseen enablers who have twisted every law in the book in the attempt to create a pro-French, pro-minority ruled Canada. Most stomach churning though, was my incessant vision of P.E. Trudeau’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, here once again being used to carry on with the obliteration of all Canada’s former laws and every principle of law that upheld the freedoms that I and millions of others had fought for.

For that, I also blame past P.M. Mike Pearson who in 1965, out of his desire for fairness had tried by means of language laws to encourage more French-speakers to gain greater access to the Federal civil service. Trudeau however, was the prime culprit who, like the proverbial “Camel let into the Tent” seized his opportunity to create an Officially Bilingual Canada that he well knew would never work for the English-speakers but would enable the ethnically insular, self-centered Quebecois and their Anglo-Quebecer Quislings to rule all of Canada – in French!

I thought “Why do these Judges all across English-speaking Canada tolerate these French language usage cases when our 1867 Constitution does not require it?” I am a Canadian born (Toronto) citizen of English descent and I was raised at home and at school in the principles of English Common law, upon which Canada was founded. So far as I am concerned, here is the real truth of the matter:

Charter Rights in conflict with Common Law Rights and Freedoms are Illegal.
I am not a lawyer. I use the vernacular as I am entitled to in all English Common law Courts (so are you). Whatever the appropriate lawyer’s terminology, the Charter is a travesty but it has one saving grace. Strangely, I have rarely seen it used in the courts. It must be used on all occasions where laws are being passed or have been passed that would override our historic rights freedoms, including those special laws assigned to particular designated minority groups and French language-speakers that are contained in this disgraceful Charter. Here is that one saving grace. Please memorize it:

“The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights and freedoms that exist in Canada.” (Section 26)

That being so makes all Employment Equity laws illegal. It makes all Group rights illegal. It makes Section 15, Sub-Section 2 of the Charter itself illegal because this Section infringes upon my right (and yours) to be the equal of every other person before and under the law. That is why I hate what has happened to Canadians. Most Canadians have become blind serfs to a disgraceful set of laws that the former would-be war-time traitor to Canada – P.E. Trudeau and that Francophile fool of a former Prime Minister, Mike Pearson created. No wonder Trudeau danced and sneered behind the Queen’s back.

The truth is that every right and freedom you obtained when you were born anywhere in Canada or when you became a landed immigrant or citizen of Canada is still yours. That includes all the rights that pre-existed the introduction of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms or any other law contrary to your existing inherent rights that has been passed or will be passed in the future. For example:

Property rights still exist as they were before the Charter. Complaints they are not in the Charter do not matter. They are still alive. They must be upheld.

Language rights that existed prior to the Charter are still valid. Forced language laws or regulations governing all employment, promotion of any type are illegal, except those written into the 1867 Constitution of Canada.

No law that infringes your personal freedoms may be passed, except those that by common consent are passed through Parliament and become Criminal or Civil law.

Justice must be blind to all but the facts and sworn testimony of any legal witness in the case before it.

No person may obtain or be granted special rights, privileges or protections “in law” by reason of skin colour, race, religion, ethnic group, disability, sex, sexual orientation or any other personal or group characteristic. Thus, “Human Rights” tribunals (Kangaroo courts) that follow no known laws or procedures and are prejudicial towards “priveledged white males” must be eliminated because they override all our former laws, principles of law and every fairness ever known to the free citizens of Canada.

The fundamental ancient Principle of the Rule of Law that must also be upheld at all times by all the citizens and courts of Canada is such that “each of us is the equal of each other before and under the law.” As a child, a youth and an adult I knew this Principle well, as did most of my contemporaries. It was embedded in our souls. The common saying went, “Prince or Pauper – Rich or Poor – No Person is above the Law”.

The United States Constitution includes almost the same protection as our Section 26. It was also designed to ensure that existing rights (English Common Laws, Principles and Procedures) will not be overridden by their Constitution or any future laws. It reads:

“The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

Yes! – and note the word “disparage” and the phrase “retained by the people” That is what our lawyers, politicians and the courts have been doing to us ever since Trudeau and Pearson’s travesties – disparaging our freedoms and sneering at the peoples laws. Their self-inflating Charter “living tree” philosophy that they may prune at will is pure social activism and an a foul expectoration upon the people’s inherent laws.

More and more people don’t vote. Too many people now disparage our democracy. Others parade, demonstrate and use violence to “change” things. They foolishly emulate the backward Middle East and their “Arab Spring unfortunates.” They “Occupy” public and private property and sneer at their own laws and governments. The socialists would rather fight for their “entitlements” than pay for their county’s security and freedoms.

To sum up folks, it was a discouraging day at the Court House. But then at my age, I know I am biologically doomed to die chagrined at the mess my countrymen have allowed to take place. All I can hope for is that our younger people will be encouraged to explore their long history of the trials of their forebearers through war and peace and correct these growing mistakes in law, principles and practice or they will lose their liberties and freedoms entirely.

By Dick Field

Recently there has been a lot of discussion about allowing noonday Muslim prayers in the cafeteria of an Ontario elementary school called “Valley Park Middle School.” The arguments made by the school Principle in support of the Muslim community for accommodation are reasonable on the face of it but they are in contravention of existing Ontario Ministry of Education laws, in that no religious activities, even Christian prayers, are allowed in Ontario’s Public schools.

Premier McGuinty was asked his opinion and he has refused to interfere, stating that the local school board is in the best position to decide. This, in spite of much earlier having made it plain that there must be only one set of laws for all Ontario and no Islamic Sharia Law will be permitted.

The conservative media has made plain its objections to the plan, arguing that there must be no accommodation. The leftist media favours accommodation.

This writer’s concern is that the conservative media’s objections focus mainly on the Muslim practice of placing male students in the front of the praying congregation, the female students in the back and worse still, segregating and not allowing menstruating females to participate in the group’s prayers.

I certainly agree that these Islamic practices represent an intolerable discriminatory practice against females and as such are entirely unacceptable in our free and open Canadian society where we value and strive to uphold the equality of the sexes. However, there is a nuch more sinister factor at work here that the media overlooked.

The Media fail to report on the Islamist stealth Jihad strategy at Work
Either the media are naive (which this writer chooses to believe) or they so frightened of being called bigots, racist or Islamophobic that they do not wish to alert the public of the reality of a subtle Jihadist form of strategic war, known as “stealth Jihad” on exhibit in regard to the Valley Park Middle School prayer accommodation.

It is also possible that the media may fear that they will fall victim to the current practice of Jihadist “lawfare” (Islamic organizations suing people and organizations through the misuse of our hate laws and/or Humane Rights Kangaroo courts).

Nevertheless, the media should have suggested to the public that perhaps stealth Jihad has been long underway at the Valley Park Middle School. Why? Because the student body of the school is already 80% Muslim (as reported) and that information alone is the strongest evidence of Islamic stealth Jihad at work.

The demand for prayers in the school was merely the logical next step of stealth Jihad. This form of Jihad constitutes a non-violent war against Infidels (unbelievers) by a step by step infiltration of our society until a critical mass of Muslims is reached. When that mass is attained the Muslim leadership, supported by their more radical adherents will then demand full implementation of Sharia Law in the school and in any area they come to dominate.

The media failed us this time. The public must learn to ask the right questions of our media and politicians when Islam and its Clerics seek accommodations that contravene our Canadian laws and standards.

How the Stealth Jihadist strategy operates – Markham, Ontario – Classical Stealth Jihad in Progress
A classic case of an egregious later stage of Islamic stealth Jihad takeover is now in progress in Markham Ontario. Here the accommodating town mayor and councilors have recently approved a Mega Mosque being built on a major throughway in the centre of historic Old Markham. (Mega means a huge; an outsized mosque complete with golden dome and minarets (prayer towers) that will dominate any church or other buildings in the area).

It’s not that the elected leaders of Markham can’t read what is happening in Europe, the UK, and the USA and for that matter in a growing number of cities across Canada. They have been warned of the implications of such Muslim expansion in their city. However, like Neville Chamberlain and other appeasers before WW2, they just cannot bring themselves to see the evil they are willingly and carelessly accommodating.

It wasn’t so long ago that the Markham citizenry fought against their city council to prevent their growing Chinese community from building Mega Chinese shopping centers close to their Old Markham heritage buildings. They failed in their effort, however they did manage to keep malls at some respectable distance from the town in spite of their city council’s ethnic group pandering.

There is an old adage that to understand any puzzling political or business decision that says “Follow the money trail.” It would be wise move for the citizens of Markham to do so particularly in respect to the present Mega Mosque situation.

One almost certain answer behind the Markham council’s political choice will be the big money involved in the real estate and construction contract deals for Mega Mosque approvals, etc. Also, the chances are that a good portion of the money for the Mosque itself came from overseas Islamic funds. Oil money funding this type of stealth Jihadist infiltration is operative throughout the Western world. Canada is no exception.

Incidentally, not only has the Markham council approved the Mega Mosque but also a substantial Muslim town house development and community center nearby. Neighbouring Stouffville citizens have also seen Muslim organizations optioning acreage for Mosque and Islamic community expansion. Oil money pours in. Stealth Jihad is well underway in southern Ontario.

Say goodbye to picturesque Old Markham. Oil money big bucks will override Canadian freedoms and ultimately Western civilization itself unless our leaders exercise considerably better judgment than they have been doing over the last several decades.

Are there no Muslims that just want to integrate into our Society?
This is the question most people are inclined to ask when articles like this raise the alarm concerning stealth Jihad and the Islamic objective of the replacement of Canadian law with Muslim Sharia Law.

The answer is yes, there are many Muslims who come to Canada and wish to be left alone to join in with normal Canadian society and enjoy the freedoms they never had or could ever expect to have in their former countries. However, they are soon pressured by far too many of their Imams (Mosque priests) to avoid close friendships with all non-Muslims whom they term “Infidels.”

They are told that their only justification for immigrating to the lands of the Infidels is to wage stealth Jihad against them and eventually convert them to Islam. The teachings of Mohammed and the edicts of the Qu’ran (their Holy Book) mandate this strategy and are used push their adherents into building exclusive Islamic communities within the host societies for the purpose of eventually dominating them.

The tactic is to make the existing community uncomfortable so that the Infidels (non-Muslims) will move away and they will step by step take over our homes, businesses, schools, churches, towns, cities, political organizations and eventually our country itself.

On the way to their ultimate objective, when they have completed the domination of an area, district or town and all its facilities, as in Europe, they will brashly announce to all Infidels that we are not welcome and they will declare their districts “No Go Zones” governed by Sharia Law and out of bounds to all non- Muslims.

The way to stop all this is to resolutely say no. No accommodation, either integrate into our culture or go back to where you came from. Legal force must be used if necessary. We must adopt laws to stop the cancerous growth of any alien system of laws that any people coming to our country may wish to implement that would constitute a threat to Canadian freedoms. Islam’s Sharia Law is a theocratic system of alien and incompatible laws designed to conquer the World.

Is this article’s description of stealth Jihad true?
Yes it is, and it is an evil spreading all across Western Europe and the UK. In England there are many areas that are now designated by Islamists as “No Go” Sharia enforced areas. Signs are posted warning ordinary English citizens that may not enter unless dressed in the appropriate manner (Hijabs, Burkas, Hijabs etc.).

The enforcers are Muslim thugs that discipline their own women and make non-Muslims fear for their safety if they enter. The home government will not protect its own citizens or step in and outlaw Sharia for fear of incurring violent Jihadist terrorism. They are also afraid of being seen as opposing multiculturalism or being hateful towards Muslims.

Our Canadian politicians, local and national are also failing in their duty to protect our society either through ignorance or fear of being perceived by good Muslims or our ill-informed fellow Canadians as bigots or racists.

Many of our own citizens still like to believe the Trudeau/Pearson propaganda that all cultures are equal (our multicultural and immigration philosophy). This idiotic denial of the reality that modern western cultures are vastly superior to a multitude of other backward cultures allows this takeover by an intolerant ancient seventh century Islam. Such public lack of knowledge will be the death of our once peaceful society if not corrected.

To understand Sharia Law and its full implications see: (copy and paste URL into your search address bar)

http://answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/top_ten_sharia.htm

Note: Sharia laws are penetrating deeply into so many aspects of Western society that this one excellent article cannot cover everything. Therefore, I would suggest the reader search beyond its reach and particularly check out the advanced stealth Jihad now seriously affecting the peace and freedoms of the UK and Europe. There are numerous excellent sources and scholarly books.

Infidel Canadians and their Infidel leaders need to Wake Up
Our nation is being invaded by a calculating Islamist enemy that will swear allegiance to our country, its laws of peace and our democratic system. Yet they commit blasphemy when they do so because they contravene their own religious laws. How can they do so? Their penalty for blasphemy is severe and in some cases even death.

Quite simply they do so by following their prophet Mohammed’s sanctioned practice of “Taqiyya” that permits any Muslim to lie any time it is necessary to defend their Islamic beliefs or promote the spread of Islam.

Is it not wiser that we peacefully stop all Muslim immigration to Canada and the West now before a hot war becomes a necessity?
**********************
Dick Field, editor of Blanco’s Blog is the former founder and Chairman of the Voice of Canadian Committees and the Montgomery Tavern Society. He was editor and publisher of Voices, their newspaper. He is a graduate of the University of Toronto and Queen’s University. Dick has a wide variety of life experiences and has traveled worldwide both as a businessman and the co-owner of a travel business. He retired as a marketing officer after a thirty year career with a major Toronto life insurance company. Dick is proud to have served in combat during WW2 with the Royal Canadian Artillery in northwest Europe. Dick can be reached at letters@canadafreepress.com