By Dick Field

Recently there has been a lot of discussion about allowing noonday Muslim prayers in the cafeteria of an Ontario elementary school called “Valley Park Middle School.” The arguments made by the school Principle in support of the Muslim community for accommodation are reasonable on the face of it but they are in contravention of existing Ontario Ministry of Education laws, in that no religious activities, even Christian prayers, are allowed in Ontario’s Public schools.

Premier McGuinty was asked his opinion and he has refused to interfere, stating that the local school board is in the best position to decide. This, in spite of much earlier having made it plain that there must be only one set of laws for all Ontario and no Islamic Sharia Law will be permitted.

The conservative media has made plain its objections to the plan, arguing that there must be no accommodation. The leftist media favours accommodation.

This writer’s concern is that the conservative media’s objections focus mainly on the Muslim practice of placing male students in the front of the praying congregation, the female students in the back and worse still, segregating and not allowing menstruating females to participate in the group’s prayers.

I certainly agree that these Islamic practices represent an intolerable discriminatory practice against females and as such are entirely unacceptable in our free and open Canadian society where we value and strive to uphold the equality of the sexes. However, there is a nuch more sinister factor at work here that the media overlooked.

The Media fail to report on the Islamist stealth Jihad strategy at Work
Either the media are naive (which this writer chooses to believe) or they so frightened of being called bigots, racist or Islamophobic that they do not wish to alert the public of the reality of a subtle Jihadist form of strategic war, known as “stealth Jihad” on exhibit in regard to the Valley Park Middle School prayer accommodation.

It is also possible that the media may fear that they will fall victim to the current practice of Jihadist “lawfare” (Islamic organizations suing people and organizations through the misuse of our hate laws and/or Humane Rights Kangaroo courts).

Nevertheless, the media should have suggested to the public that perhaps stealth Jihad has been long underway at the Valley Park Middle School. Why? Because the student body of the school is already 80% Muslim (as reported) and that information alone is the strongest evidence of Islamic stealth Jihad at work.

The demand for prayers in the school was merely the logical next step of stealth Jihad. This form of Jihad constitutes a non-violent war against Infidels (unbelievers) by a step by step infiltration of our society until a critical mass of Muslims is reached. When that mass is attained the Muslim leadership, supported by their more radical adherents will then demand full implementation of Sharia Law in the school and in any area they come to dominate.

The media failed us this time. The public must learn to ask the right questions of our media and politicians when Islam and its Clerics seek accommodations that contravene our Canadian laws and standards.

How the Stealth Jihadist strategy operates – Markham, Ontario – Classical Stealth Jihad in Progress
A classic case of an egregious later stage of Islamic stealth Jihad takeover is now in progress in Markham Ontario. Here the accommodating town mayor and councilors have recently approved a Mega Mosque being built on a major throughway in the centre of historic Old Markham. (Mega means a huge; an outsized mosque complete with golden dome and minarets (prayer towers) that will dominate any church or other buildings in the area).

It’s not that the elected leaders of Markham can’t read what is happening in Europe, the UK, and the USA and for that matter in a growing number of cities across Canada. They have been warned of the implications of such Muslim expansion in their city. However, like Neville Chamberlain and other appeasers before WW2, they just cannot bring themselves to see the evil they are willingly and carelessly accommodating.

It wasn’t so long ago that the Markham citizenry fought against their city council to prevent their growing Chinese community from building Mega Chinese shopping centers close to their Old Markham heritage buildings. They failed in their effort, however they did manage to keep malls at some respectable distance from the town in spite of their city council’s ethnic group pandering.

There is an old adage that to understand any puzzling political or business decision that says “Follow the money trail.” It would be wise move for the citizens of Markham to do so particularly in respect to the present Mega Mosque situation.

One almost certain answer behind the Markham council’s political choice will be the big money involved in the real estate and construction contract deals for Mega Mosque approvals, etc. Also, the chances are that a good portion of the money for the Mosque itself came from overseas Islamic funds. Oil money funding this type of stealth Jihadist infiltration is operative throughout the Western world. Canada is no exception.

Incidentally, not only has the Markham council approved the Mega Mosque but also a substantial Muslim town house development and community center nearby. Neighbouring Stouffville citizens have also seen Muslim organizations optioning acreage for Mosque and Islamic community expansion. Oil money pours in. Stealth Jihad is well underway in southern Ontario.

Say goodbye to picturesque Old Markham. Oil money big bucks will override Canadian freedoms and ultimately Western civilization itself unless our leaders exercise considerably better judgment than they have been doing over the last several decades.

Are there no Muslims that just want to integrate into our Society?
This is the question most people are inclined to ask when articles like this raise the alarm concerning stealth Jihad and the Islamic objective of the replacement of Canadian law with Muslim Sharia Law.

The answer is yes, there are many Muslims who come to Canada and wish to be left alone to join in with normal Canadian society and enjoy the freedoms they never had or could ever expect to have in their former countries. However, they are soon pressured by far too many of their Imams (Mosque priests) to avoid close friendships with all non-Muslims whom they term “Infidels.”

They are told that their only justification for immigrating to the lands of the Infidels is to wage stealth Jihad against them and eventually convert them to Islam. The teachings of Mohammed and the edicts of the Qu’ran (their Holy Book) mandate this strategy and are used push their adherents into building exclusive Islamic communities within the host societies for the purpose of eventually dominating them.

The tactic is to make the existing community uncomfortable so that the Infidels (non-Muslims) will move away and they will step by step take over our homes, businesses, schools, churches, towns, cities, political organizations and eventually our country itself.

On the way to their ultimate objective, when they have completed the domination of an area, district or town and all its facilities, as in Europe, they will brashly announce to all Infidels that we are not welcome and they will declare their districts “No Go Zones” governed by Sharia Law and out of bounds to all non- Muslims.

The way to stop all this is to resolutely say no. No accommodation, either integrate into our culture or go back to where you came from. Legal force must be used if necessary. We must adopt laws to stop the cancerous growth of any alien system of laws that any people coming to our country may wish to implement that would constitute a threat to Canadian freedoms. Islam’s Sharia Law is a theocratic system of alien and incompatible laws designed to conquer the World.

Is this article’s description of stealth Jihad true?
Yes it is, and it is an evil spreading all across Western Europe and the UK. In England there are many areas that are now designated by Islamists as “No Go” Sharia enforced areas. Signs are posted warning ordinary English citizens that may not enter unless dressed in the appropriate manner (Hijabs, Burkas, Hijabs etc.).

The enforcers are Muslim thugs that discipline their own women and make non-Muslims fear for their safety if they enter. The home government will not protect its own citizens or step in and outlaw Sharia for fear of incurring violent Jihadist terrorism. They are also afraid of being seen as opposing multiculturalism or being hateful towards Muslims.

Our Canadian politicians, local and national are also failing in their duty to protect our society either through ignorance or fear of being perceived by good Muslims or our ill-informed fellow Canadians as bigots or racists.

Many of our own citizens still like to believe the Trudeau/Pearson propaganda that all cultures are equal (our multicultural and immigration philosophy). This idiotic denial of the reality that modern western cultures are vastly superior to a multitude of other backward cultures allows this takeover by an intolerant ancient seventh century Islam. Such public lack of knowledge will be the death of our once peaceful society if not corrected.

To understand Sharia Law and its full implications see: (copy and paste URL into your search address bar)

http://answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/top_ten_sharia.htm

Note: Sharia laws are penetrating deeply into so many aspects of Western society that this one excellent article cannot cover everything. Therefore, I would suggest the reader search beyond its reach and particularly check out the advanced stealth Jihad now seriously affecting the peace and freedoms of the UK and Europe. There are numerous excellent sources and scholarly books.

Infidel Canadians and their Infidel leaders need to Wake Up
Our nation is being invaded by a calculating Islamist enemy that will swear allegiance to our country, its laws of peace and our democratic system. Yet they commit blasphemy when they do so because they contravene their own religious laws. How can they do so? Their penalty for blasphemy is severe and in some cases even death.

Quite simply they do so by following their prophet Mohammed’s sanctioned practice of “Taqiyya” that permits any Muslim to lie any time it is necessary to defend their Islamic beliefs or promote the spread of Islam.

Is it not wiser that we peacefully stop all Muslim immigration to Canada and the West now before a hot war becomes a necessity?
**********************
Dick Field, editor of Blanco’s Blog is the former founder and Chairman of the Voice of Canadian Committees and the Montgomery Tavern Society. He was editor and publisher of Voices, their newspaper. He is a graduate of the University of Toronto and Queen’s University. Dick has a wide variety of life experiences and has traveled worldwide both as a businessman and the co-owner of a travel business. He retired as a marketing officer after a thirty year career with a major Toronto life insurance company. Dick is proud to have served in combat during WW2 with the Royal Canadian Artillery in northwest Europe. Dick can be reached at letters@canadafreepress.com

Drug Injection Sites – Time to curb the Arrogance of the Supreme Court of Canada

by Dick Field

On October 1, 2011 the Supreme Court of Canada once again overstepped its powers. This abuse of our freedoms must stop. It is time that Canadians who care about our fundamental laws and values brought this unelected body of elitist lawyers to heel.

I do not care that legal or illegal Drug Injection sites may or may not work miracles in rehabilitating drug addicts when compared with the ultimate horror of the social activism of the members of the Supreme Court of Canada. From what I have read of the various trials of legal injection sites in other countries, their success when proven, totally depends on a strong mandatory associated rehabilitation program for their addicted users. Otherwise, forget it. Its only result will be the creation of more and more dangerous addicts. I have seen no mandatory rehabilitation (detoxification) scheme associated with the Supreme’s illegal dictatorial ruling in favour of the Vancouver or other Canadian potential sites.

The Supreme Court’s arrogance stems from the flawed Charter of Rights and Freedoms mythology that the Charter is some kind of “Living Tree” and that they the unelected few have the right to clip and prune that mythical tree into a social icon of forward thinking law based on nothing other than their own superior intellect. Theirs is a putrid case of pure egotistical self-adulation. It is a gross manifestation of the illegal seizure of power by people who should know better.

The Truth of the Matter
In truth, the only body of human beings in Canada able to proclaim new law based on societal needs is the 306 elected men and woman of the Parliament of Canada. Such new law(s) are presumed to be based on the opinions of millions of voting citizens who express their views through their Members of Parliament in a free and open society. Our MPs then represent those views, debate them, form necessary committees of inquiry, negotiate, examine evidence and take years sometimes decades to decide on contentious courses of action. Ultimately, they draft laws (Bills) and vote on them; Aye or Nay!

Once voted through the House of Commons those Bills go to the appointed Senate of several score of Senators to examine the proposed bills, hear witnesses from the public interested in the effects of the Bills if passed into law and eventually return them to the Commons with proposed changes to debate and yet once again vote to pass into law or vote down.

The final step is to formally send the thoroughly considered new law to the Governor General of Canada for final approval. If such law is perceived as being totally outlandish the Governor General may refuse to sign but rarely has this taken place. Nevertheless, in a truly democratic government any new law properly takes time and careful thought because untried laws must never breach existing law or the ancient principles underlying those laws.

Compare that exhaustive procedure to the meager thought processes and procedures of nine unelected men and women using their own hasty methods, based on no known prior case precedents. Theirs is a rush to create new law based on their own perceived superior mental powers. Is this not an arrogant form of treason – the overthrow of the historical supremacy of our Parliament of Canada?

What authority or law gave these Honourable Supremes the Divine Right to rule?
The answer is absolutely no government, no person or law permits these people to do so! They have taken that upon themselves with the introduction of Prime Minister Trudeau’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Charter being written law may require interpretation when criminal or civil cases arise and that is one of the legitimate Supreme Court’s duties. However, they have conjured up this mythical “Living Tree” concept that they, being the select few can shape Canada’s future by exercising their undefined authority far beyond their legitimate duties. Our law schools now teach new law students this mythical Living Tree philosophy thereby broadening their future Judge-instigated social activist powers.

The Supreme Court has a legitimate duty when on occasion Parliament may make ask the Supreme Court to examine a new proposed law to point out any errors that may exist in that law and return it to Parliament for revision or cancellation if revision is not possible. They also have a duty to examine new proposed law to insure it breaches no existing law or principle.

Finally, and the majority of the work of the Supreme Court is to hear cases involving individuals and corporations that are argued on the basis of the particulars of each case and compare that case with existing judgments made on similar cases tried by courts in the past. These are called precedents and are the basis of our slow and carefully changing Common Laws.

Historically, when a lower court decision is questioned or makes possible errors of judgment then appeals may be made to superior courts and eventually if necessary arrive at the Superior Court of Canada for a final decision. It is then that the Supreme Court most capably and thoroughly is required to render its judgments. That is how the Supreme Court earns its place in a free and democratic society. There are no higher courts of appeal. The buck stops with their decisions. All their decisions must be based on common law precedents.

However, no authority in Canada or any parliamentary society on earth has given their Supreme Courts the right to issue new law based solely on their own opinion. It has taken 1000 years of historical struggle to arrive at our parliamentary system of government and the vital principle that the Parliament of its citizens is the Supreme Lawmaker.

We have a constitutional Monarchy that is called constitutional because the Monarch is subject to the will of Parliament. That precedent was established in 1639 by the High Court of the Parliament of England when it executed King Charles I by axe and block because he attempted to rule by the Divine Right of Kings (The will of God). King Charles was a Roman Catholic and was encouraged by the Pope to exercise this ancient right. Not a wise idea in a primarily Protestant House of Commons led by Oliver Cromwell.

The Answer must be the introduction of a High Court of Parliament in Canada
I won’t go into too much detail but the High Court when established must define the limitations of the activities of the Supreme Court of Canada and establish appropriate penalties for infractions of those limitations:

1. The Judges must be confined to judging appeals on Common Law cases from the lower courts and on occasion cases of civil law (Napoleonic Code) from Quebec.

2. They must assist the Parliament of Canada on new law when submitted to them for advice when Parliament feels such law may be questionable or in conflict with existing law.

3. They must totally abstain from becoming issuers of new law, which is the sole function of the Parliament of Canada and the Governor General of Canada.

Penalties for any Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) defiance of Parliament
While we have outlawed the death penalty for treason we need not be so draconian. I would suggest the following:

1. A warning be issued by the High Court of Parliament to cease and desist from any activity going beyond the limitations of their duties.

2. If the Supreme Court defies Parliament, the Chief Judge of the Supreme court be brought before the Court for examination.

3. If the Chief Judge refuses to curtail his/her Court’s activities, then sworn statements be taken from all judges of the SCC as to their agreement or disagreement with the High Court order.

4. Those in disagreement to be temporarily relieved at half pay from their positions on the SCC and new Judges are appointed temporarily to fill their vacancies.

5. Those dissenting Judges put on trial for their positions and fired if found guilty. They will also lose their license to practice law for 5 years in any official capacity or court in Canada.

The Selection of the High Court of Parliament
My suggestion would be that a panel of 31 Parliamentarians of the three leading parties in the House of Commons be chosen to sit as judges for a period of not more than 10 days within 3 months of any perceived breach of the rules by the SCC. These should be respected senior MPs. Any judgment must be rendered within that period of time. (31 represents approximately 10% of the House of Commons members). The number of those selected from each Party should be in proportion to their number of seats in the House.

The High Court would need an administrative office to carry out the issue of warrants, letters of warning and letters of judgments rendered etc and the receipt of official complaints against the SCC or its members. They might also be charged with the writing the original rules for the SCC areas of valid duties and penalties for abuse of limitations of those duties.

All the Bills and other documents for the creation of the office of The High Court of the Parliament of Canada and its procedures rules and penalties to be passed by the entire Parliament of Canada.

Let’s get it done
Let the Citizens of Canada rise to the occasion and defend our once dearly held Freedoms before these would be Dictators wearing decorous red cloaks, white collars and ties subject us to their unelected Divine Rule of social activism; that mythical “Living Tree” of Trudeau’s Machiavellian Charter of Fights and Fiefdoms.

By Dick Field
MP Seats by population only
It really shouldn’t be more than common sense that our representation of MPs in Canada’s parliament ought to reflect the number of voters in each province and by electoral district within each province. The system has been grossly out of whack for generations. To put it simply, my vote should be equal to yours and visa versa in respect to our influence on any election of MPs. However, the actual process has always taken into consideration a myriad of historical and political factors.

As a result of the political and formula manipulations of the various commissions and parliamentary committees that have decided these matters in the past, many classic out-of-balance cases of under or over representation have taken place.

Ontario today, according to the present formula is about 18 seats short of their required number of MPs. British Columbia would need 7 more seats. Alberta 5 more seats. The rest of the provinces require no change. The present discussion has raised concerns with the announcements that P.M. Harper and his Conservative government will seek to adjust the representation to more properly reflect the population numbers across all Canadian Provinces and territories.

Some years ago a special arrangement was made to protect Quebec’s unique culture and minority influence within Canada with a guarantee of a fixed number of 75 seats in parliament regardless of its population decline or growth. Quebec has been over-represented as a result. Now, with a declining population relative to the growing populations of some other provinces of Canada, they are concerned they will lose their extraordinary influence on Canadian affairs.

As a consequence, the Quebec National Democratic Party (NDP) opposition House Leader, Thomas Mulcair is therefore not only demanding that Quebec should retain their fixed number of MPs, even if their population continues to decline but is demanding that an ever increasing number of seats be allocated by formula to Quebec in perpetuity to equate with 25% of Canada’s growing population in order to retain their exceptional influence over Canada.

The appropriate answer is NO!
Why? Simply because Quebec has forfeited any right to even ask for such consideration, given their dictatorial and obnoxious behaviour towards English-speaking Canadians within and without Quebec over the last 40 years. Quebec’s blackest trademark being their language laws that have caused over 500,000 of their English- speaking Canadians to abandon Quebec rather than tolerate their demeaning, arrogant and (some of their citizens) violent criminal behaviour.

Then again, Quebec refused to contribute to the defence of the free world in the two great conflagrations of the 20th century. Their leadership and the majority of their citizens of French origin considered World War I as a British Empire war even though their beloved homeland was invaded and that very Empire, including Canada, was fighting to defeat the invading Germans.

In WW II French Quebec exhibited sympathies towards the Nazis, were anti-Semitic and were pro the Laval government (a pro-Nazi government that co-operated with the Nazis after the fall of France). During WW II (1939 to 1945) our former Prime Minister P. E. Trudeau (1968-1979 & 1980-1984) and his Quebec cronies exhibited this attitude in spades to the extent of near treason. *
* See pages 121 to 123 and Chapter 9 of “Young Trudeau,” by biographer – historians Max and Monique Nemni, publishers; McClelland an Stewart Ltd, Toronto (2006).

There are few positive contributions Quebec has ever made or will ever make to Canada. They are a racist, church-school brainwashed and an anti-Anglais linguistic backwater of childlike misdirection. So long as they stain the Canadian scene, Canada can never progress as it should. Even the damage done to our laws and the fundamental ethical principles underlying those laws by our Quebecois oriented past leadership will take decades to rectify. Their actions have so corrupted our own English-speaking citizens that few now have any idea who they are or the great culture of freedom they represent.

Spoiled Brats – Quebec Politicians
The time has come to call the shot on the juvenile behaviour of Quebecois politicians and the foot stamping tantrums of their unhappy belle Province citizens. This spoiled Nation within the Nation of Canada can never be raised to adulthood by our federal MP coddlers who themselves seemingly have great difficulty in exercising any form of disciplined child rearing.

If Quebec eventually is abandoned to follow its childlike destructive ways of trashing the very freedoms of their own family and their English-speaking neighbours, especially by constantly demanding more than their fair share, they will forever swim in the anarchy they have created. Their so-called Francophonie of like minded nations to which the rest of Canada is presently forced to contribute millions of dollars can barely tolerate the Quebecois, sneering as they do at les Habitant’s French patois accents. The Quebecois reciprocate with a complete distain of the linguistic snobbery of their so-called friends.

Our Quebec baby-minding English-speaking MPs
Surely our English-speaking MPs, especially those of our majority Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) will become mothers and fathers of sterner stuff and say, No dear, Daddy and Mommy think its time to make your mind up, either shape up and learn to eat and behave properly or you will be sent to bed with no dinner and isolated from the family. Maybe the Childrens Aid will take you, but we can no longer accept your miserable infantile antics. We have to progress in this world and not be dragged down forever by your incessant demands while the rest of us work hard and fight the wars of civilization and die in the tens of thousands for your freedoms while you sneer at the maudis Anglais and run for the bush. Peace or war you are a dead weight on our progress and social harmony.

Time to say Goodbye; Adieu et Bon Voyage!
Mr. Mulcair represents the true feelings of the majority of Quebecers. We have heard it all before, encore et encore. It has infected all of Canada, especially our armed services, the R.C.M.P., the Federal government, the civil service and the Ottawa National Capital district plus surrounding towns and villages. We loath the federal government’s paid French-Canadian agitators now inserted into every English-speaking province to demand millions of dollars of unnecessary French language services. They must be sent packing back to their Nation of Quebec. The whole charade is a multi-billion dollar insult to Canadians from coast to coast. Quebec indeed represents a huge financial and morally corrupting presence.

A cautionary note:
We must always recognize those very special French Canadian volunteers who have fought valiantly in Canadas wars and died and sacrificed with the rest of us, they are the heroic valiant exceptions. We also honour the large minority of outstanding French Canadian Quebecers who do not think this way but work successfully with the majority, but as with all disturbed societies it is virtually impossible for the latter to make their voices heard above the cacophony of the rest.

We must take action now – Declare the Rest of Canada and Territories other than Quebec, Officially Unilingual English.
Repeal the Official Languages Act now and declare all provinces and territories unilingual English-speaking in exactly the same manner as Quebec has eliminated English in that province. We should not however, mimic the nasty demeaning sign and language police with their vindictive informers. We must stop the language wars by eradicating the lost causes of the French language and French/English official bilingualism throughout all levels of government and our courts everywhere in Canada.

Quebec companies wishing to trade into Canada, a free enterprise country, could label their products in English or French or any other languages to freely accommodate their client needs (with reciprocity agreements of course). All official government services for French speakers in Canada must cease immediately. Quebec must separate as an adult Nation soon thereafter. Quebec must issue its own currency and assume their portion of our national Canadian debt. Canada would assume its portion. Territorial redistribution would eventually be necessary according to pre 1867 arrangements. **

** Mr. James Allan is a former professional accountant and long time student of the Quebec situation in Canada as to the true costs of Official Bilingualism. Just this September 2011 he has proposed a logical reassignment of Quebec territory in the event of a negotiated separation. Please let me know should you wish to receive either of his studies.

To Prime Minister Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada
The foregoing plan is the only practical and moral choice possible to rebalance our confederation of Canadian provinces. We must eliminate the baby-sitting of an amoral childlike Quebec. We have declared them a Nation. Let them be a Nation of adults.

The first step is to eliminate the language atrocity. Repeal the Official Languages Act now and all its divisive regulations. Unify all Canadians in the new French-free Canada so that we can progress boldly into the future under our ancient laws with no special laws for tribal groups defined by race, nationality, ethnicity or skin colour or any other aparheid group designation.

Canadians must also learn or relearn the basic principles of their heritage. Especially the principle that each individual Canadian must be subject to the same laws and equal to each other before and under those laws. Freedom demands we return to the fundamental tenets of our society. Free speech, Freedom of the media, Freedom of Association, presumption of innocence, etc. Those values millions have fought and died for.

There is no possibility of maximizing the strength of Canada while these ever-bickering French/English confrontations continue. Quebec will never accept Canada unless they control it. English-speaking Canadians will never permit that type of dictatorship or any other tribal or religeous group’s dictatorship. Now is the time to act.

May you, Rt. Hon. Prime Minister Harper, become the all-Canadian statesman of the 21st century by giving birth to the creation of a new united English-speaking Canada and the possibility of an adult French-speaking good neighbour; the Nation of Quebec.

*************************************************

Individual Rights and Freedoms destroyed – Apartheid Canadian style – Hatred of Whites promoted by the Toronto District School Board (T.D.S.B)
by Dick Field
It doesn’t seem to matter what paper you open today or what source of news is your favourite bad medicine, there seems no end to the divisive rhetoric been thrown around by the purveyors of hate. If it isn’t the senseless gunplay in our major cities by our drug infested minority youth or the unpleasant anti-Jewish ambience of practically every university across Canada, it’s the deliberate separation of Canadians into superior or inferior classes of citizens by the official (government) forced bilingual policies.

Who are to blame for this unhealthy state of affairs? The answer is every damn politician or lawyer (judges) backed by progressive academics who have implemented the laws and policies that have created our new Canadian culture of legal separate identity based on race, skin colour, ethnic group, sex. sexual- orientation, religion and language.

The warm-hearted know nothings say, “Oh but minorities would be discriminated against by the majority if we didn’t have anti-discriminations laws.” Not true, such laws induce discrimination by declaring that all group identities are equal to each other, thereby dismissing the very culture they immigrated here to join. Before the mid-1960’s Canadians were free individuals, now we are just another tribal group. Thus our former Prime Ministers Mike Pearson and Pierre Elliott Trudeau deliberately destroyed our time honoured British principle that:

Every individual person is the equal of every other individual person before and under exactly the same laws applicable to all.

How often I have tried to explain this to some naive person who writes or tells me, “Oh you don’t know what it’s like to be a woman, a black person or an Italian etc. coming to Canada or living here. How can you say we are all equal because I have been discriminated against again and again in jobs and promotions and been called nasty names.” My answer is straightforward, “Lady, biases exist the world over and even if you are discriminated against, which may or may not be the case; that is not a reason to change our laws and design new ones just to suite you just because you are somehow different.”

Cases of real prejudice in employment etc. are solved by persistent free discussion of unfairness and the gradual acceptance of change encouraged by the majority who inherently believe in fair treatment for all. In fact fairness as perceived by the people is the basis of all English-derived Common law. It has always been the case that newcomers from different cultures must prove themselves and earn the respect of their fellow citizens before being fully accepted. That may take a generation or more depending on performance and adaptability. What needs to be understood by all Canadians, new and old, is that laws must never be passed that apply only to select individuals or groups. Such laws will destroy any society over time.

I particularly despise those politicians, who are dismissive of, or antagonistic to English-speaking Canadians and delight in telling our new immigrants that, “Canada is blank slate and you are invited to help us create a new multicultural identity.”

This accursed “blank slate” propaganda denies our eight century history of British derived laws and principles since Magna Carta was signed in 1215 A.D. The truth is that the vast majority of Canadians expect newcomers to respect the laws and culture they came to join. Immigrants are not welcome to impose upon us their peculiar alien laws, practices and anti-Canadian mores. Just ask the average Canadian that has had a couple of beers what is expected of immigrants and he or she will tell you bluntly that:

“I don’t care where they come from so long as they join with us, work hard and help build our country and if they can’t do that, then send them back to wherever they came from.” That’s what new immigrants swore to do when they took the oath of allegiance and that’s what we expect of them.

The Jewish immigrant mistake in changing our laws
Jewish post WW2 newcomers made some serious mistakes that have come back to haunt them. When the mass of Jewish people fleeing from Europe after the nightmare of the Holocaust came to Canada their motto was “Never Again.” They were panicked when they saw that there was still a residue of social/religious anti-Semitism in Canada. They were frightened by any individual or group of Neo-Nazis or Holocaust deniers. Together with several other ethnic groups they lobbied the government for special laws and protections. They hugely exaggerated their fears because the vast majority of Canadians were never anti-Semitic. We had just fought a war to stop that cruelty. It was a panic driven but understandable case of stereotyping a whole society.

The result of their actions and other groups was the passing of the Multicultural Act of Canada; the Employment Equity Acts and ultimately Section 15, Sub Section (2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the latter verifying that all the laws passed or to be passed in Canada for the protection of minorities from the majority were legal.

Another massive attack on Canadian liberties, also endorsed by the Charter, occurred with the setting up Human Right’s kangaroo courts solely designed to protect minority groups and minority individuals. This was a total anathema to the majority of Canadians that understood the insult to our inherent British derived Canadian freedoms.

The following is abstracted from one of several letters I wrote to Mordechai Ben-Dat, Editor of the Canadian Jewish News, (this in 1999, none were published):

“Unfortunately I am becoming increasingly alarmed at the constant undermining of Canadian society and its laws and principles by concerned human rights activists in the Jewish community who are drawing entirely the wrong lessons from this great human tragedy (the Holocaust). These activists including the Bn’ai Brith League of Human Rights and the Canadian Jewish Congress seem to think that the great lesson of the Holocaust is to shut down unpopular, derisive, and so-called anti-Semitic or racist opinion and punish those who hold such views.
Their constant heavily funded lobbying, to which ordinary Canadians have no access, to strengthen hate laws, pillory individuals who offend by the use of Human Rights behavioural tribunals to shut people up or to badger employers and get people fired from their jobs; to threaten hotels and other facilities with picketing and rabble rousing if they allow controversial speakers is very frightening. Far from crowing about their successes, these activists should be terrified. If a man cannot speak freely in this society, founded on the fundamental freedom to express his or her opinion, even if it is an insulting one, a double edged sword has been created. Sooner or later it will strike back at the wielder.”

A double-edged sword indeed cuts both ways
Witness the unpleasant and dangerous invasion of our University campuses by the newer Palestinian Islamist groups that have made life on these campuses a threat to the safety and scholastic endeavours of Jewish students. Witness the actions of the public service pro-Palestinian anti-Semitic activist unions. Witness the near riots created by both groups to stop foreign speakers when they represent views they disagree with.

Above all, universities are supposed to be places of free and open debate. Unfortunately, the Deans and Boards of many of our universities would rather shut down troublesome speakers than provide secure venues and expel violent activist students.

There are many residual consequences of having broken our British derived Common Laws including the absurd recent trials in of Ezra Levant, Mark Steyn and McLean’s Magazine by a kangaroo court of our so-called Human Rights tibunal system. Luckily they had the means and skills to defend themselves and won their case. Most do not. Thousands have been hurt and unjustly damaged and more will continue to be victimized.

To this date there is not one government in Canada with the will to eradicate these abominations. My assessment after years of trying to get governments to abolish these tribunals is that governments believe that Canadians think that anything titled “Human Rights” must be good and so they are afraid to even try to publicly discuss destroying so-called Human Rights Commissions and their corrupt tribunals.

I suspect there may be other reasons in that they curry favour with minority groups that feel they need special courts to “get justice” especially when it costs nothing to lay a charge and if they win they get cash in pocket and if they lose there are no penalties. It is also another ready honey pot from which governments can dole out jobs to political “friends” as Human Rights Commissioners and tribunal judges (no qualifications required).

Is there apartheid in Canada?
Yes, in spades! Laws based solely on race, skin colour or ethnic characteristics are laws of separate legal identity. We have therefore established a racist, apartheid society filled with tribal antagonisms. Our justice system used to protect each individual person equally; Groups were thus protected automatically. As the Dutch have said recently when they repealed their official multicultural policy “Creating a nation of tribes will kill the nation itself.”

Why? Because quite simply all cultures are NOT equal, some are more civil than others or more literate than others or more socially and legally advanced than others. Some values new immigrant groups bring to us are not our values and are a threat to our country’s freedoms and liberties. We are on a very slippery slope. A classic example and extreme precursor of the growth of tribal hatreds in Canada is illustrated by the Toronto District School Board’s new definition of racism. This unbelievable message of hate for privileged white people will indoctrinate children far into the future and create a nightmare for this country if allowed to remain in force.

From the TDSB Resource: Teaching about Human Rights 9/11 and Beyond A Package for Educators Grades 7-12 Definitions Pages 5-6 – found on page 70 of this document.

Racism
“While people in different contexts can experience prejudice or discrimination, racism, in a North American context, is based on an ideology of the superiority of the white race over other racial groups. Racism is evident in individual acts, such as racial slurs, jokes, etc., and institutionally, in terms of policies and practices at institutional levels of society.

The result of institutional racism is that it maintains white privilege and power (such as racial profiling, hiring practices, history, and literature that centre on Western, European civilizations to the exclusion of other civilizations and communities). The social, systemic, and personal assumptions, practices, and behaviours that discriminate against persons according to their skin colour, hair texture, eye shape, and other superficial physical characteristics.”

Conclusion
Canada has created a racist Apartheid state that has employed many instruments of bad law and bad institutions and bad propaganda to destroy our laws, our history and the great principles of our British legal heritage. It can only get worse unless we wake up every Canadian citizen that is now fast asleep or has succumbed to the “inevitable.” I particularly implore young people of all ethnicities to cast off this mess of pottage our politicians have created and grasp the nettle. Get involved in our political system and make sure courageous politicians return to our British derived Common laws and principles. Unless you do, you will most certainly lose all your freedoms and the Nation of Canada.